Online Consultation
Make Appointment
main min
Close this search box.
Close this search box.

ICMR Guidelines: Cervical Cancer Screening Explained by Gynaecologist Dr. Amita

ICMR guidelines for cervical cancer screening

Cervical cancer is the second most frequent malignancy in Indian women after breast cancer. Cervical cancer is avoidable because it has a well-defined, protracted pre-malignant period that can be diagnosed by routine screening tests and follow-up. Unfortunately, most Indian women are unaware of the screening. Call and book your appointment with Dr. Amita Shah, the best gynae for women in Gurgaon.


What is cervical cancer?

Cervical cancer is a form of cancer that develops at the lower end of the uterus, where it meets the upper vagina, known as the uterine cervix. Due to a lack of access to screening and immunizations against human papillomaviruses, cervical cancer is a leading cause of death in women in the majority of underdeveloped countries (HPVs).

Cervical Cancer Screening Process Explained, Comparison of HPV, Pap, and HPV/Pap Tests, Age-Related Considerations in Cervical Cancer Screening


HPV Vaccination and Its Role in Cervical Cancer Prevention,
ICMR Guidelines: Stay Informed for Better Women's Health


What is the difference between an HPV test, a Pap test, and an HPV/Pap test, according to the ICMR guidelines for cervical cancer screening?

A Pap test, also known as a Pap smear, checks for abnormal cells in the cervix that can lead to cancer. An HPV test detects the human papillomavirus, a virus that can lead to cervical cancer. An HPV/Pap test combines an HPV test with a Pap test.  


An HPV test and a Pap test are both performed in the doctor’s office by collecting a sample of cervical cells with a scraper or brush.  

For decades, the Pap test has been the gold standard in cervical cancer screening. 


HPV testing is a newer form of screening for cervical cancer. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved two HPV tests for use as primary HPV tests, which means they are not part of an HPV/Pap contest. Other HPV tests are permissible as part of an HPV/Pap contest.  


Why does the revised guideline favour an HPV test over a Pap test or an HPV/Pap contest? 


Cervical cancer precursors can be detected using any of the three tests. However, research has shown that HPV tests are more accurate and dependable than Pap testing. Also, because HPV tests can rule out disease so effectively, they do not need to be done as frequently.  


Although the Pap test has resulted in significant reductions in the rates of cervical cancer and death from the disease, it does have some limitations. Because Pap tests are less sensitive than HPV tests, they may miss some precancers and must be performed regularly.  


They also detect a variety of aberrant cell alterations, including some modest changes unrelated to HPV. As a result, many people who have an abnormal Pap test result have a very low risk of developing cervical cancer.  


HPV/Pap co-testing is only slightly more sensitive than HPV testing, but it’s less efficient as it involves two tests. It also identifies many minor changes that have a very low chance of developing into cancer. That is a significant additional effort and cost for an entire population.  



Screening with an HPV test alone was not recommended in 2012 since the FDA had not yet approved that strategy. As equal choices, the guideline provided HPV testing alone, testing, and Pap testing. The new guidelines differ in that they prioritise HPV testing over the other two tests.  


Why does the new guideline propose commencing screening at the age of 25, rather than the age of 21? 


Using data from new trials, researchers determined that the advantages of cervical cancer screening may not outweigh the risks for those aged 21 to 24.  

This is a significant change linked to HPV vaccinations. 


The first group of women who received the HPV vaccine when they were younger are now in their twenties and can be screened for cervical cancer. HPV vaccines are extremely effective at preventing HPV infections, particularly infections with HPV strains 16 and 18, which cause many cervical malignancies. As a result, the immunizations have resulted in a decrease in HPV infections and cervical cancer in this age range.  


Furthermore, most HPV infections in young women resolve on their own. Screening persons in this age group frequently results in unneeded therapy, which might have negative consequences. As a result, the ICMR recommends beginning screening at the age of 25. 


Have the recommendations for people aged 65 and up changed? 


No, the recommendations for this age group remain unchanged. If you have a lengthy history of normal screening test results, you can discontinue screening at the age of 65. If you have had an abnormal result or anything worrisome on a screening test in the past, or if you have had treatment for cervical cancer or precancer, you should continue to be screened. 


Over the years, the recommended age limit for cervical cancer screening has remained consistent across different standards. However, there are current initiatives to research age restriction more thoroughly because it is an area with limited data. There is a growing interest in examining people who have an abnormal screening test result at an older age to see whether they need extra years of screening or more frequent screening.  

Isn’t it better for patients to get examined more frequently and with more tests if these screening tests save lives? 


No. When used too frequently, these tests, like many others, have the potential to cause more harm than good. Cervical cancer screening tests pose some risks.  


Physical discomfort may result from screening and follow-up testing. There is also the chance that inaccurate, or false-positive, test results will cause more worry and other emotions. And if your test results are erroneous, you may be subjected to unwanted follow-up testing or even therapy.  


Cervical cancer or precancer treatment can permanently damage the cervix. This may increase the likelihood of major difficulties in a future pregnancy, such as miscarriage or premature birth.  


Therefore, although testing more frequently or with more tests may seem like a good idea, it can lead to more harm. To update their recommendations, the ICMR thoroughly reviewed the possible benefits and hazards of each screening test for each age group.  


Do persons who received the HPV vaccine still need to be screened for cervical cancer? 


Yes, the new guideline recommends screening for those who have received the HPV vaccine. It does not suggest making a screening decision based on whether a person has received the vaccine or not.  


However, as the rate of HPV vaccination among people eligible for cervical cancer screening rises, we may see additional adjustments in screening guidelines in the future.  


Why do cervical cancer screening guidelines constantly change? 


It’s a dynamic scenario for a variety of reasons. One is that we have seen incredible benefits from the HPV vaccine, which is constantly changing the picture for screening.  


We have also seen significant advancements in new technologies such as HPV testing, as well as improvements in some of the secondary tests used for follow-up after screening.  


All these advancements have enabled us to create more precise forecasts of a person’s risk of developing cervical precancer and cancer. We also have fresh evidence from large studies that give us confidence that we can update screening techniques to improve outcomes for women and the health care system.  


Call and book your appointment with Dr. Amita Shah, the best gynaecologist in Gurgaon.

ICMR Guidelines: Stay Informed for Better Women's Health

Popular Blogs

Social Profile


Get Some Advice?

What Our Patients Say About Us

section title line
Ankush Gaur
Ankush Gaur
Geeta Upadhyay
Geeta Upadhyay
I would highly recommend Dr Amita Shah to anyone in need of a gynaecologist. She is incredibly professional and always takes care of her patients. I have never had an issue with her and she has always been very responsive to my needs. I would definitely recommend her to anyone in need of a gynaecologist!
Sandeep Ranga
Sandeep Ranga
I had been suffering from severe pain and heavy bleeding for so many years.My ultrasound showed a large cyst in the uterus .All doctors had advised open surgery but Dr Amita Shah advised Laparoscopic surgery.Surgery was very smooth,I had no pain and my recovery was very fast.I am very thankful to Dr Amita Shah.She is a very skilled surgeon and very polite and gentle with her patients.Highly recommended for Laparoscopic surgery.
I have made all the pregnancy visits to Dr. Amita Shah, and my end-to-end experience with her has been wonderful. I was someone who was absolutely terrified of needles, but with Dr. Amita Shah's constant guidance and good consultation, I could overcome a lot of my stress and worries related to delivery as well as during the pregnancy phase. Both the doctor and her clinic staff are helpful and amiable. She was all ears when it came to even the tiniest of details and issues, listened calmly and resolved all my issues. She was also constantly available via phone and WhatsApp to clear any doubts that popped up in my head in addition to the in-clinic visits where she eased my mind and resolved plenty of my concerns. At the time of my delivery, she offered complete mental support and her presence itself offered calmness to me. I highly recommend Dr. Amita Shah for her professionalism, empathy and supportive attitude. By God's grace, we are blessed with a baby girl in December, and I have been on the path to a smooth and fast recovery since then.
monika agarwal
monika agarwal
My end to end experience with Dr. Amita Shah has been very amazing. I found her trustworthy in the very first visit. The medications very limited and She handled the emergency of water break very diligently and ensured safe delivery of my baby. She is calm, positive and considerate and will make your pregnancy journey beautifuI with no stress. I highly recommend Dr Amita Shah.
M Grewal
M Grewal
I have been visiting Dr Amita for 11 years now. She has helped deliver my kids and then for few other concerns. She is very kind, empathetic, and very gentle. She understands and a great listener. Trust her completely.
Zoya Khan
Zoya Khan
I consulted Dr Amita for my Scar Endometriosis, she not only understood my problem but at the same time explained the entire ailment in detail. She assisted me at every step, her calm demeanour and patience made it very comfortable for me. The best part was she was so approachable although the process. I became a fan of her the way she did my dressings, removed my drain pipe with no pain extremely softly, she has magic in her hands .The best gynaecologist I have ever met. God Bless her always. Thank you so much.
Suchismita Adhikari
Suchismita Adhikari
Our experience with Dr Amita mam and her clinical expertise has been fabulous. Her staff, Ms Komal and Ms. Ashu are very kind and cooperative. Dr. Amita operated on my mother with such finnese. Explained each and every step in detail. She is a very good gynaecologist. Happy we found her to treat my mom.