Online Consultation

ICMR Guidelines: Cervical Cancer Screening Explained by Gynaecologist Dr. Amita

ICMR guidelines for cervical cancer screening

Table of Contents

Cervical cancer is the second most frequent malignancy in Indian women after breast cancer. Cervical cancer is avoidable because it has a well-defined, protracted pre-malignant period that can be diagnosed by routine screening tests and follow-up. Unfortunately, most Indian women are unaware of the screening. Call and book your appointment with Dr. Amita Shah, the best gynae for women in Gurgaon.

 

What is cervical cancer?

Cervical cancer is a form of cancer that develops at the lower end of the uterus, where it meets the upper vagina, known as the uterine cervix. Due to a lack of access to screening and immunizations against human papillomaviruses, cervical cancer is a leading cause of death in women in the majority of underdeveloped countries (HPVs).

Cervical Cancer Screening Process Explained, Comparison of HPV, Pap, and HPV/Pap Tests, Age-Related Considerations in Cervical Cancer Screening

 

HPV Vaccination and Its Role in Cervical Cancer Prevention,
ICMR Guidelines: Stay Informed for Better Women's Health

 

What is the difference between an HPV test, a Pap test, and an HPV/Pap test, according to the ICMR guidelines for cervical cancer screening?

A Pap test, also known as a Pap smear, checks for abnormal cells in the cervix that can lead to cancer. An HPV test detects the human papillomavirus, a virus that can lead to cervical cancer. An HPV/Pap test combines an HPV test with a Pap test.  

 

An HPV test and a Pap test are both performed in the doctor’s office by collecting a sample of cervical cells with a scraper or brush.  

For decades, the Pap test has been the gold standard in cervical cancer screening. 

 

HPV testing is a newer form of screening for cervical cancer. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved two HPV tests for use as primary HPV tests, which means they are not part of an HPV/Pap contest. Other HPV tests are permissible as part of an HPV/Pap contest.  

 

Why does the revised guideline favour an HPV test over a Pap test or an HPV/Pap contest? 

 

Cervical cancer precursors can be detected using any of the three tests. However, research has shown that HPV tests are more accurate and dependable than Pap testing. Also, because HPV tests can rule out disease so effectively, they do not need to be done as frequently.  

 

Although the Pap test has resulted in significant reductions in the rates of cervical cancer and death from the disease, it does have some limitations. Because Pap tests are less sensitive than HPV tests, they may miss some precancers and must be performed regularly.  

 

They also detect a variety of aberrant cell alterations, including some modest changes unrelated to HPV. As a result, many people who have an abnormal Pap test result have a very low risk of developing cervical cancer.  

 

HPV/Pap co-testing is only slightly more sensitive than HPV testing, but it’s less efficient as it involves two tests. It also identifies many minor changes that have a very low chance of developing into cancer. That is a significant additional effort and cost for an entire population.  

 

 

Screening with an HPV test alone was not recommended in 2012 since the FDA had not yet approved that strategy. As equal choices, the guideline provided HPV testing alone, testing, and Pap testing. The new guidelines differ in that they prioritise HPV testing over the other two tests.  

 

Why does the new guideline propose commencing screening at the age of 25, rather than the age of 21? 

 

Using data from new trials, researchers determined that the advantages of cervical cancer screening may not outweigh the risks for those aged 21 to 24.  

This is a significant change linked to HPV vaccinations. 

 

The first group of women who received the HPV vaccine when they were younger are now in their twenties and can be screened for cervical cancer. HPV vaccines are extremely effective at preventing HPV infections, particularly infections with HPV strains 16 and 18, which cause many cervical malignancies. As a result, the immunizations have resulted in a decrease in HPV infections and cervical cancer in this age range.  

 

Furthermore, most HPV infections in young women resolve on their own. Screening persons in this age group frequently results in unneeded therapy, which might have negative consequences. As a result, the ICMR recommends beginning screening at the age of 25. 

 

Have the recommendations for people aged 65 and up changed? 

 

No, the recommendations for this age group remain unchanged. If you have a lengthy history of normal screening test results, you can discontinue screening at the age of 65. If you have had an abnormal result or anything worrisome on a screening test in the past, or if you have had treatment for cervical cancer or precancer, you should continue to be screened. 

 

Over the years, the recommended age limit for cervical cancer screening has remained consistent across different standards. However, there are current initiatives to research age restriction more thoroughly because it is an area with limited data. There is a growing interest in examining people who have an abnormal screening test result at an older age to see whether they need extra years of screening or more frequent screening.  

Isn’t it better for patients to get examined more frequently and with more tests if these screening tests save lives? 

 

No. When used too frequently, these tests, like many others, have the potential to cause more harm than good. Cervical cancer screening tests pose some risks.  

 

Physical discomfort may result from screening and follow-up testing. There is also the chance that inaccurate, or false-positive, test results will cause more worry and other emotions. And if your test results are erroneous, you may be subjected to unwanted follow-up testing or even therapy.  

 

Cervical cancer or precancer treatment can permanently damage the cervix. This may increase the likelihood of major difficulties in a future pregnancy, such as miscarriage or premature birth.  

 

Therefore, although testing more frequently or with more tests may seem like a good idea, it can lead to more harm. To update their recommendations, the ICMR thoroughly reviewed the possible benefits and hazards of each screening test for each age group.  

 

Do persons who received the HPV vaccine still need to be screened for cervical cancer? 

 

Yes, the new guideline recommends screening for those who have received the HPV vaccine. It does not suggest making a screening decision based on whether a person has received the vaccine or not.  

 

However, as the rate of HPV vaccination among people eligible for cervical cancer screening rises, we may see additional adjustments in screening guidelines in the future.  

 

Why do cervical cancer screening guidelines constantly change? 

 

It’s a dynamic scenario for a variety of reasons. One is that we have seen incredible benefits from the HPV vaccine, which is constantly changing the picture for screening.  

 

We have also seen significant advancements in new technologies such as HPV testing, as well as improvements in some of the secondary tests used for follow-up after screening.  

 

All these advancements have enabled us to create more precise forecasts of a person’s risk of developing cervical precancer and cancer. We also have fresh evidence from large studies that give us confidence that we can update screening techniques to improve outcomes for women and the health care system.  

 

Call and book your appointment with Dr. Amita Shah, the best gynaecologist in Gurgaon.

ICMR Guidelines: Stay Informed for Better Women's Health

Medical Disclaimer:
This content is intended for educational purposes only. It should not be considered medical advice or used for diagnosing or treating any medical condition. Please consult a qualified doctor or a healthcare professional for personalized guidance.

👉 Schedule a Consultation with the Best Gynaecologist in Gurgaon 👇
📞 Call: +91 9773975611
🌐 Website: https://dramitashah.com/
📧 Email: amita.gynaec@gmail.com
👇 Quora: https://dramitashah.quora.com/
📱 WhatsApp: https://wa.me/9773975611

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What Our Patients Say About Us

section title line
Posted on Google Google
Komal Srivastava profile picture
Komal Srivastava
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I got my laparoscopic treatment for Endometriosis issue. I am an old patient of Dr Amita shah for other PCOS treatment , that was also going good but recently I recognised with Endometriosis that explain by doctor clearly. Then me & my husband decide to get treatment on time. Today is my 8th after laparoscopic Endometriosis treatment & I am really very happy to get in touch in safe hands. Laparoscopy recovery is amazing. Dr Amita shah is really a polite doctor & gave clear explanation for treatment. I am so lucky & thankful to doctor.
Posted on Google Google
Manoj Karn profile picture
Manoj Karn
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My wife go through Total Laproscopic Hysterectomy for Adenomyosis. We came to doctor first time by Google. Dr. Amita shah is really polite doctor, she explain firstly then give time to understand each point then proceed next that is rare in doctors. Dr. Amita shah is v.v experience doctor in her laproscopic work. Her skill is showing perfectly. My surgery was so good. She didn't have any pain after surgery & her recovery is amazing. We didn't expect like this smooth treatment. Doctor's coordinator (Ashu) , her OT physician ( Manoj ) are really good to guide for everything that needs to understand for a patient after reach at Hospital. Dr. Amita shah is really good doctor. Doctor is GOD for us. We highly recommend Dr Amita shah for any Gynae issue. Doctor will give you true & best opinion. We thankful to doctor & her team.
Posted on Google Google
jagdish jangra profile picture
jagdish jangra
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My wife underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for heavy bleeding. We came to Dr Shah after we came to know about her from another patient. My wife surgery was so good, she did not have any pain after surgery and her recovery was very fast. She was discharged within a day after surgery. On going home she was normally doing all work. We are really thankful for the excellent care she gave. She is a wonderful doctor and highly recommended for hysterectomy surgery.
Posted on Google Google
Rajbir Singh Rana profile picture
Rajbir Singh Rana
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My wife got treatment from Dr. Amita shah . Doctor did Hysteroscopy polypectomy . Dr. Amita shah is v.v nice & polite to talk with her patient. Her calm nature is really helpful to understand each point of view. She explain everything before treatment her patients. My wife & me are really thankful to doctor for treatment my wife . Dr. Amita shah & her team take care of their patient even after any treatment. Thanks to all of them
Posted on Google Google
Vikas Chaudhary profile picture
Vikas Chaudhary
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dr. Amita shah is v.v experience doctor in her laproscopy. My wife go through a laproscopy Hysterectomy. Today , we visit to doctor for review. Her explanation is v.v smooth & satisfied. My wife is soo lucky to meet her & more confident. Today , she is very happy & all of us are v.v thankful to Dr. Amita shah . Doctor & her team is really easy approachable. They all are polite to talk.
Posted on Google Google
Neeraj Rajput profile picture
Neeraj Rajput
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We recently underwent laparoscopic myomectomy surgery under the care of Dr. Amita Shah, and I must say we had an excellent experience. From the very first consultation, Dr. Shah made us feel comfortable, informed, and confident about the procedure. She explained everything in detail and patiently answered all our questions. The surgery went smoothly, and my wife recovered much faster than we had expected. Her expertise in laparoscopic techniques and the way she handled everything with such calmness and professionalism is truly commendable. The post-operative care was also very good — she was always available for guidance and support whenever needed. We are extremely grateful for her compassionate approach and dedication towards her patients. Highly recommend Dr. Amita Shah for anyone looking for safe and effective fibroid treatment or laparoscopic.
Posted on Google Google
Reena Yadav profile picture
Reena Yadav
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
My experience with Dr Amita shah become unexpected. She did my Total Laproscopic hysterectomy . I met her firstly & really feel positive . Dr. Amita shah is v.v experience doctor in her Laproscopic work. I am v.v thankful to Dr. Amita shah & her all team members ( Manoj, Ashu, Ruchi ) . Doctor’s nature & explanation , way if talking like a family member. Thanks again for all over help me out from my problem.
Posted on Google Google
Guddi Yadav profile picture
Guddi Yadav
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dr amita shah was very helpful and supportive throughout the whole process Highly recommended dr amita shah.